Urban Design and Interior Design and Terminology | Sustainable Cities Collective

It has been said that Central Park is New York’s “living room.” New technology firms and 21st century schools compete in creating collaborative workplaces forming “neighborhoods” connected by “streets” leading to “commons” or “town squares.” Flexibility and adaptability are king, blurring the lines made by walls until inside is out and outside is in.

Nature is part of this game, first with buildings set in nature (the office park) and then with nature in buildings, like in the huge tent-like structure proposed by Bjarke Ingels (BIG) for Google in Mountainview.

It can be confusing to follow the many iterations of forms, from urban to suburban back to urban, from undesignated spaces to specialized spaces back to undesignated ones. Closed offices open up, then fill with cubicles, then become open offices again.

We move from specialized classrooms to open classrooms, to flexible learning studios with moveable walls and learning streets. Houses with rooms along hallways become open plan houses, combine to form McMansions with some of both, then collapsing into all-in-one micro units.

What does it tell us about the state of society, technology, planning and design if we use urban design terms to describe interior space arrangements and room names to describe urban design?

via Urban Design and Interior Design and Terminology | Sustainable Cities Collective.Uber-1


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s